Writing a College Essay - Different College Essay Topics to Consider

Writing a College Essay - Different College Essay Topics to ConsiderIf you have decided to write a college essay, you will be given many different college essay topics to choose from. Each topic has its own benefits and drawbacks, depending on your specific situation. However, it is important to note that the best way to decide which college essay topics to use is to base the topics on your experiences and present your best reasoning in each of them.The first question that you need to ask yourself when choosing your college essay topics is where do you want your essay to take place? Are you going to be a freshman? Or, are you going to be a sophomore? You will also have to decide how many years you are going to be in college. Some people have college essays that range from three to seven years, while others may be able to do an essay with two or three years at most.After deciding on how long you are going to be in college, then you will have to determine what students would be most ap propriate for your essay. For example, if you are having an essay about freshmen students, then you may want to focus more on the negative aspects of the coming freshman class, especially if you are currently in one. This will make for a more humorous and intriguing essay. On the other hand, if you are having an essay about someone who is an older, mature student, then you may want to focus more on positive aspects of that student's life.After deciding on the main character of your essay, you can now narrow down the different college essay topics that you have to write about. It may seem like too much work, but it's actually not. Since this is all going to be a reflection of who you are as a person, you can determine what you need to think about that really reflects who you are. For example, you may want to focus on one or two particular personalities in the college community that you know of. If you do, you will be able to describe those characteristics in a unique way.So now that you have narrowed down your college essay topics, it's time to take a look at the pros and cons of each of the possible topics. You will find out that writing college essays will be a lot of fun. Unlike high school or a professional job, writing a college essay is not terribly stressful. Writing a college essay is the same process as writing any other essay, even a class assignment. You can even have it published, and if you really want, you can even sell it!When choosing your essay topics, you must think about what you want to say. Your essay will reflect your personality, so you must write about things that you have always considered important and write about topics that interest you. If you want a good conversational essay, you will want to focus on topics that you would talk about with friends and family. With a conversational essay, you can gain more respect and credibility among your peers.You have made a lot of decisions when it comes to your essay topics, and it's time to se e if any of them are still working. Writing a college essay can be quite fun, but it takes time. If you want to be the best that you can be, then it's important to spend some time to try and get the most out of your essay.

Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror - 1072 Words

To understand Habeas Corpus and how it has played its part in the war on terror, a look at what it is and how it started should be looked at. Habeas Corpus, (â€Å"you should have the body†), is an old legal procedure that protects against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. It is issued by a judge and does not determine whether the individual is guilty or innocent, but whether they are illegally imprisoned. If the charges are considered valid, the individual will go to trial, if not, the person goes free. The beginning of habeas corpus has dated back the medieval times. It was first used in 1305, even though some sources say that it was first recorded before the Magna Carta in 1215. Reference was made about habeas corpus by the†¦show more content†¦2) Removal to another federal district court. 3) The denial of bail or parole. 4) A claim of double jeopardy. 5) The failure to provide for a speedy trial or hearing. 6) The legality of extradition to a foreign country. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/habeas_corpus) Habeas corpus is a part of the Constitution (Suspension Clause of the Constitution) in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2. The clause states, â€Å"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it†.(http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/suspension-clause/) The individual who is imprisoned has the right to get a petition to federal court for the writ of habeas corpus. Most of these petitions are filed as a pro se case, meaning they represent themselves rather than by a lawyer. Federal courts have the authority to grant habeas corpus to prisoners but only Congress can suspend the writ of habeas corpus through affirmative actions or a delegation to the Executive. Habeas corpus was suspended in history. The first time was done by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War. He imprisoned Confederate sympathizers for no reason other than their Confederate sympathies. He arrested them bec ause he thought they were a threat and used the â€Å"â€Å"unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion† clause to do so. He began

Annotated Bibliography Of Children In Uganda - 1316 Words

Katriona Pratt Dr. Eleanor Latham WR 121: Essay 2 5 November 2017 Annotated Bibliography Dalen, Nina, et al. They Don t Care What Happens to Us. the Situation of Doubleorphans Heading Households in Rakai District, Uganda. BMC Public Health, vol. 9, no. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 321-333. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-321. In addition to the fact that these children need adult guidance to become citizens who act in accordance with the expectations in their communities, material aid is important in order to reduce the children s experiences of being Different and constantly experiencing survival anxieties. At the national level, 45.3% of all children are vulnerable; the percentage of such children in Rakai District is 48.8. The†¦show more content†¦Markova, N. E. Social Orphanhood under the Conditions of Depopulation. Russian Education Society, vol. 53, no. 5, May 2011, pp. 85-92. EBSCOhost, doi:10.2753/RES1060-9393530507. Measures The Life Events Checklist was created by the National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder to facilitate the diagnosis of PTSD. The list of experienced or witnessed events includes those that have been found to be predictive of the diagnoses of PTSD, anxiety, and depression and is one of the most frequently used instruments by researchers to assess potentially traumatic event exposure across countries and cultures. Although one event may be associated with multiple event categories, it is not possible to establish from the data how many events were included in multiple categories. Each of the six event categories was scored as 1 if an event was reported and zero if no event was reported. Table 3 describes rates of reported potentially traumatic events, including the percentages of children reported to have ever experienced the event, experienced the event more than one time, and experienced the event in the 12 months prior to the interview. The nonorphan sample experienc ed fewer event categories than the sample of orphaned and abandoned children, yet 87% reported at least one event; 13% experienced four or more types of events. Figure 1 suggests that the relationship between potentially traumatic events and PCL-S scores, butShow MoreRelated moral Essay3440 Words   |  14 Pageshis work at Harvard University and developed his stage model in 1969. Working through the 1950’s and 60’s using longitudinal and cross sectional studies he proposed 6 stages of development (see Appendix 1) identified through the responses of children presented with moral dilemmas. Piaget, his former tutor, proposed only 2 stages of moral development these being the Hetronomous and Autonomous stages. He was not so much interested in the judgments made but the reasons for the judgment, differing

Psychological issues in eyewitness identify - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Answer: Both eye witness testimony and DNA evidence have both advantages and disadvantages. They are both prone to errors that can lead to wrongful conviction. Both DNA evidence and eye witness are never foolproof. DNA evidence is only one amongst many types of evidences jurors need to consider when determining a case. TV shows like CSI have promoted forensic science to a level that certain jurors have impracticable expectations of analysis of DNA. Thus, according DNA supreme weight than other evidences (Buckleton, Bright and Taylor 2016). Whereas maintaining the DNA databanks could assist police in identifying criminals, it further poses ethical dilemmas where samples are kept by authorities from individuals yet to be accused in any crime (Balding and Steele 2015). DNA quests, maneuvers whereby officers gather samples from a many individuals in different geographic areas to identify a perpetrator, have remained contentious. However, DNA profiling has a great advantage that hinges DNAs specificity. Moreover, comparatively minute DNAs quantities at a crime scene is able to yield adequate material that can be properly analyzed. Forensic scientists characteristically liken a minimum of thirteen DNA markers in 2 samples. The likelihood that any given 2 people might have similar profiles remains estimated to being under 1/10 billion. Thus, where specimens remain gathered appropriately and correct procedure is undertaken, DNA profiling proves tremendously accurate and reliable means of comparing the DNA of a suspect with the specimen gathered at crime scene. Thus, as a member of juror, before considering the reliability of DNA evidence, it will always be imperative for me to remember that DNA analysis, similar to any other forensic science technique, stays susceptible to human error. For example, contamination in the course of specimen gathering or analysis is able to dramatically reduce DNA reliability and accuracy. Generally, DNA evidence remains increasingly valuable in isolating suspects than in proving guilt. Conversely, eye witness testimony is only credible under certain circumstance and science urges jurors to cautious in relying on accounts of eyewitness because it remains indecisive, and mostly, surprisingly imprecise. One reason why eye witness is unreliable is that since people with some psychological disorders like antisocial personality disorder alongside substance dependence, remain at increased risk for criminal involvement, eyewitnesses have heightened likelihood for false identification of this group. Even though many jurors have placed heavy weight on eyewitness testimony when deciding whether one is guilty, most of these cases have been overturned by DNA evidence and subsequently exonerated (Sporer, Malpass and Khnken 2014). Thus, as a member of a juror, I will never uncritically accept eyewitness reports since they are prone to many factors that bias these reports. Thus, unlike other jurors who incline towards putting supreme weight to eyewitnesses testimony reporting that they remained very certain regarding respective identifications, I will lean towards studies that have shown that extremely confident eyewitness remain solely usually somewhat more accurate- and occasionally no more so- as opposed to less confident ones. In my view, therefore, DNA evidence is more reliable than eyewitness testimony because of the many instance in which convicts have been exonerated using DNA due to wrongful conviction due to false identification of the eyewitness. Sources of error DNA evidence source of error may originate from cross-contamination of sample. The crime scene evidence is cleaned up which sometime destroy the evidence during testing. Retesting must therefore be done in order to obtain accurate result from the study sample. Another potential error that may occur is misinterpretation of sample results. The laboratory is prone of assigning or mistyping evidentiary samples. If the sample is mistakenly assigned then this will led to false incrimination (Gill 2014). The third cause of error in DNA matches is in case there is mislabelling of samples. The correct way of finding the actual error is when the retest of the sample from original source is performed. However, this procedure is always unavailable hence rarely used. One source of error in eye witness is wrongful identification. This results from reconstruction of memory whereby questioning by a lawyer can change the testimony of the witness as fragments of memory could mistakenly be combined with info provided by lawyer culminating in inaccurate recall. Also, the eyewitness could be wrongly selected by police and hence give wrong eyewitness testimony. Yes, I think these questions would change if I were not studying science. It is the background I have in forensic science, especially DNA evidence and analysis that I have got to learn the false that are attached to eyewitness identification (Buckleton, Bright and Taylor 2016). Before, I studied science, I trusted eyewitness, but I have come to realize that science tells jurors never to rely on fickle and always inaccurate eyewitness. This is because science has disapproved my initial misconception that memory works like a video recorder. However, I have come to understand that memory are reconstructed instead of played back every time eyewitness recall them. This leaves eyewitness reports at a disadvantage than DNA because even cross-examination by the lawyer can change the testimony of the witness as fragments of memory could unknowingly be merged with info provided by examiner leading to recall inaccuracy (Roberts 2014). References Balding, D.J. and Steele, C.D., 2015.Weight-of-evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles. John Wiley Sons. Buckleton, J.S., Bright, J.A. and Taylor, D. eds., 2016.Forensic DNA evidence interpretation. CRC press. Gill, P., 2014.Misleading DNA evidence: reasons for miscarriages of justice. Elsevier. Roberts, N., 2014. The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony. Sporer, S.L., Malpass, R.S. and Khnken, G. eds., 2014.Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Psychology Press. Toglia, M.P., Read, J.D., Ross, D.F. and Lindsay, R.C. eds., 2017.The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Volume I: Memory for events. Psychology Press.